BCE vs SQM
Comparison between BCE Inc (BCE, Company) and Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company).
BCE is from the Communication Services sector, while SQM is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed BCE, delivering a return of +13.7% compared to -7.9%
BCE vs SQM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BCE vs SQM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BCE vs SQM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BCE | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +0.64% | +6.03% |
| 2025 | +9.90% | +91.19% |
| 2024 | -37.00% | -38.56% |
| 2023 | -4.40% | -15.40% |
| 2022 | -10.67% | +70.49% |
| 2021 | +28.05% | +2.60% |
| 2020 | -1.19% | +87.42% |
| 2019 | +22.82% | -27.79% |
| 2018 | -12.62% | -35.04% |
| 2017 | +15.90% | +113.53% |
| 2016 | +18.16% | +61.04% |
| 2015 | -10.67% | -20.43% |
| 2014 | +12.64% | -1.99% |
| 2013 | +4.60% | -54.46% |
| 2012 | +8.37% | +7.62% |
| 2011 | +22.36% | -7.72% |
| 2010 | +34.46% | +53.00% |
| 2009 | +43.46% | +51.16% |
| 2008 | -46.90% | +46.55% |
| 2007 | +56.35% | +33.91% |
| 2006 | +18.26% | +23.39% |
| 2005 | +5.52% | +82.30% |
| 2004 | +11.98% | +52.01% |
| 2003 | +25.97% | +94.94% |
| 2002 | -16.12% | -8.87% |
| 2001 | -16.64% | +19.25% |
| 2000 | +45.08% | -10.37% |
| 1999 | +44.93% | +9.77% |
BCE vs SQM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BCE was -60.66%, occurring on Dec 12, 2008. Recovery took 870 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The current BCE drawdown is -46.87%. The current SQM drawdown is -25.54%.
| Rank | BCE | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -60.66% Nov 6, 2007 - Apr 20, 2011 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 |
| #2 | -55.28% Apr 20, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 |
| #3 | -50.46% Mar 27, 2000 - Aug 11, 2005 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 |
| #4 | -34.06% Feb 18, 2020 - Mar 22, 2021 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 |
| #5 | -20.26% Sep 19, 2005 - Sep 12, 2006 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 |
| #6 | -20.12% Dec 27, 1999 - Jan 26, 2000 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 |
| #7 | -18.36% Oct 11, 2006 - Apr 4, 2007 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 |
| #8 | -17.79% Jan 16, 2015 - Mar 16, 2016 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 |
| #9 | -16.17% Dec 13, 2017 - Apr 12, 2019 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 |
| #10 | -15.72% May 8, 2013 - May 13, 2014 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 |
| #11 | -12.80% Aug 12, 2016 - Jul 20, 2017 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 |
| #12 | -11.32% Jul 6, 2007 - Sep 18, 2007 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 |
| #13 | -10.72% Feb 16, 2000 - Mar 21, 2000 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 |
| #14 | -10.10% Jul 15, 2011 - Aug 31, 2011 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 |
| #15 | -9.15% Nov 26, 1999 - Dec 6, 1999 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 |
Correlation
Correlation between BCE and SQM is 0.78 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
BCE vs SQM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BCE | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.72% | 1.41% |
| 2025 | 6.98% | 0.18% |
| 2024 | 12.47% | 0.59% |
| 2023 | 7.29% | 8.34% |
| 2022 | 6.39% | 9.66% |
| 2021 | 5.37% | 3.92% |
| 2020 | 5.82% | 1.64% |
| 2019 | 5.16% | 4.55% |
| 2018 | 5.84% | 5.37% |
| 2017 | 4.63% | 2.73% |
| 2016 | 5.15% | 4.77% |
| 2015 | 6.00% | 2.00% |
| 2014 | 5.02% | 4.71% |
| 2013 | 5.23% | 3.21% |
| 2012 | 5.20% | 1.69% |
| 2011 | 4.96% | 1.40% |
| 2010 | 4.95% | 0.87% |
| 2009 | 5.47% | 2.70% |
| 2008 | 3.56% | 3.71% |
| 2007 | 3.53% | 2.01% |
| 2006 | 4.46% | 1.76% |
| 2005 | 5.10% | 1.49% |
| 2004 | 4.12% | 1.21% |
| 2003 | 3.89% | 1.20% |
| 2002 | 4.22% | 1.88% |
| 2001 | 2.54% | 2.16% |
| 2000 | 304.77% | 42.10% |
| 1999 | 0.38% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks