BC vs GRFS
Comparison between Brunswick Corp (BC, Company) and Grifols SA (GRFS, Company).
BC is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while GRFS is from the Healthcare sector.
5-Year PerformanceBC has outperformed GRFS, delivering a return of -2.4% compared to -12.6%
BC vs GRFS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BC vs GRFS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BC vs GRFS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BC | GRFS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +6.54% | -17.32% |
| 2025 | +19.81% | +26.06% |
| 2024 | -30.50% | -32.67% |
| 2023 | +36.85% | +32.27% |
| 2022 | -26.88% | -26.98% |
| 2021 | +33.33% | -39.47% |
| 2020 | +29.08% | -21.16% |
| 2019 | +30.51% | +31.32% |
| 2018 | -15.94% | -19.94% |
| 2017 | +0.98% | +44.23% |
| 2016 | +10.75% | +2.30% |
| 2015 | -0.06% | -3.95% |
| 2014 | +14.30% | -1.76% |
| 2013 | +48.20% | +42.07% |
| 2012 | +56.47% | +158.95% |
| 2011 | -5.70% | -12.53% |
| 2010 | +40.27% | N/A |
| 2009 | +174.58% | N/A |
| 2008 | -74.51% | N/A |
| 2007 | -44.91% | N/A |
| 2006 | -20.43% | N/A |
| 2005 | -15.01% | N/A |
| 2004 | +56.93% | N/A |
| 2003 | +56.97% | N/A |
| 2002 | -6.80% | N/A |
| 2001 | +48.01% | N/A |
| 2000 | -22.99% | N/A |
| 1999 | -1.05% | N/A |
BC vs GRFS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BC was -95.58%, occurring on Dec 1, 2008. Recovery took 2241 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for GRFS was -78.00%, occurring on Mar 6, 2024. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current BC drawdown is -23.19%. The current GRFS drawdown is -68.77%.
| Rank | BC | GRFS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -95.58% Dec 1, 2004 - Oct 25, 2013 | -78.00% Feb 21, 2020 - Mar 6, 2024 |
| #2 | -61.01% May 7, 2021 - Apr 8, 2025 | -38.75% Jul 21, 2011 - Feb 2, 2012 |
| #3 | -60.43% Sep 19, 2018 - Jul 15, 2020 | -37.14% Jun 9, 2014 - Jun 21, 2017 |
| #4 | -39.66% May 3, 2002 - Oct 28, 2003 | -28.71% Jun 12, 2018 - Jan 7, 2020 |
| #5 | -39.03% Jun 26, 2001 - Jan 24, 2002 | -19.20% Jan 16, 2018 - Jun 12, 2018 |
| #6 | -38.86% Nov 3, 1999 - May 17, 2001 | -16.59% Apr 30, 2013 - Jul 25, 2013 |
| #7 | -31.98% Feb 17, 2015 - Dec 8, 2016 | -16.32% May 3, 2012 - Jul 3, 2012 |
| #8 | -23.07% Jul 14, 2017 - Jan 30, 2018 | -14.48% Mar 12, 2014 - Jun 5, 2014 |
| #9 | -20.17% Apr 21, 2004 - Sep 24, 2004 | -12.71% Aug 2, 2013 - Nov 21, 2013 |
| #10 | -19.00% Jul 29, 2020 - Nov 17, 2020 | -11.16% Jun 22, 2017 - Oct 31, 2017 |
| #11 | -16.67% Mar 20, 2014 - Oct 31, 2014 | -9.82% Nov 2, 2012 - Dec 21, 2012 |
| #12 | -15.41% Mar 15, 2021 - May 3, 2021 | -9.72% Jul 31, 2012 - Sep 21, 2012 |
| #13 | -13.66% Dec 9, 2013 - Mar 20, 2014 | -9.54% Jun 2, 2011 - Jul 15, 2011 |
| #14 | -11.37% Mar 24, 2017 - Jun 13, 2017 | -9.35% Nov 3, 2017 - Jan 5, 2018 |
| #15 | -10.31% Jan 30, 2018 - May 21, 2018 | -8.56% Jan 10, 2020 - Feb 18, 2020 |
Correlation
Correlation between BC and GRFS is -0.08 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
BC vs GRFS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BC | GRFS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.61% | 1.25% |
| 2025 | 2.32% | 1.88% |
| 2024 | 2.60% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 1.65% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 2.03% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 1.27% | 3.20% |
| 2020 | 1.30% | 0.83% |
| 2019 | 1.45% | 1.55% |
| 2018 | 1.68% | 2.32% |
| 2017 | 1.24% | 1.24% |
| 2016 | 1.13% | 1.67% |
| 2015 | 1.04% | 2.01% |
| 2014 | 0.88% | 1.32% |
| 2013 | 0.22% | 0.60% |
| 2012 | 0.17% | 4.50% |
| 2011 | 0.28% | 9.37% |
| 2010 | 0.27% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 0.39% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 1.19% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 3.52% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.88% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.48% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.21% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.57% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 2.52% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 2.30% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 3.13% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.58% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks