BC vs CE
Comparison between Brunswick Corp (BC, Company) and Celanese Corp - Series A (CE, Company).
BC is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while CE is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceBC has outperformed CE, delivering a return of -2.4% compared to -19.7%
BC vs CE - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BC vs CE - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BC vs CE - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BC | CE |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +6.54% | +12.43% |
| 2025 | +19.81% | -38.05% |
| 2024 | -30.50% | -54.38% |
| 2023 | +36.85% | +55.63% |
| 2022 | -26.88% | -37.55% |
| 2021 | +33.33% | +35.90% |
| 2020 | +29.08% | +9.77% |
| 2019 | +30.51% | +37.93% |
| 2018 | -15.94% | -14.05% |
| 2017 | +0.98% | +37.19% |
| 2016 | +10.75% | +21.58% |
| 2015 | -0.06% | +14.23% |
| 2014 | +14.30% | +10.81% |
| 2013 | +48.20% | +20.17% |
| 2012 | +56.47% | -2.50% |
| 2011 | -5.70% | +5.23% |
| 2010 | +40.27% | +24.49% |
| 2009 | +174.58% | +147.37% |
| 2008 | -74.51% | -70.95% |
| 2007 | -44.91% | +68.02% |
| 2006 | -20.43% | +32.00% |
| 2005 | -15.01% | +20.04% |
| 2004 | +56.93% | N/A |
| 2003 | +56.97% | N/A |
| 2002 | -6.80% | N/A |
| 2001 | +48.01% | N/A |
| 2000 | -22.99% | N/A |
| 1999 | -1.05% | N/A |
BC vs CE Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BC was -95.58%, occurring on Dec 1, 2008. Recovery took 2241 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CE was -84.87%, occurring on Mar 3, 2009. Recovery took 716 trading sessions.
The current BC drawdown is -23.19%. The current CE drawdown is -71.93%.
| Rank | BC | CE |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -95.58% Dec 1, 2004 - Oct 25, 2013 | -84.87% Jun 23, 2008 - Apr 26, 2011 |
| #2 | -61.01% May 7, 2021 - Apr 8, 2025 | -78.96% Mar 28, 2024 - Nov 20, 2025 |
| #3 | -60.43% Sep 19, 2018 - Jul 15, 2020 | -53.33% Nov 26, 2019 - Nov 9, 2020 |
| #4 | -39.66% May 3, 2002 - Oct 28, 2003 | -48.67% Jan 5, 2022 - Mar 20, 2024 |
| #5 | -39.03% Jun 26, 2001 - Jan 24, 2002 | -45.39% Jul 21, 2011 - Oct 21, 2013 |
| #6 | -38.86% Nov 3, 1999 - May 17, 2001 | -28.13% Jul 31, 2018 - Sep 5, 2019 |
| #7 | -31.98% Feb 17, 2015 - Dec 8, 2016 | -25.76% Jul 2, 2015 - Oct 27, 2016 |
| #8 | -23.07% Jul 14, 2017 - Jan 30, 2018 | -23.96% May 8, 2006 - Dec 5, 2006 |
| #9 | -20.17% Apr 21, 2004 - Sep 24, 2004 | -23.70% Dec 14, 2007 - Apr 21, 2008 |
| #10 | -19.00% Jul 29, 2020 - Nov 17, 2020 | -22.89% Jul 13, 2007 - Oct 29, 2007 |
| #11 | -16.67% Mar 20, 2014 - Oct 31, 2014 | -22.59% Jul 3, 2014 - Apr 17, 2015 |
| #12 | -15.41% Mar 15, 2021 - May 3, 2021 | -22.32% Apr 1, 2005 - Jul 20, 2005 |
| #13 | -13.66% Dec 9, 2013 - Mar 20, 2014 | -18.75% Aug 23, 2005 - Jan 17, 2006 |
| #14 | -11.37% Mar 24, 2017 - Jun 13, 2017 | -15.96% Nov 14, 2013 - Apr 21, 2014 |
| #15 | -10.31% Jan 30, 2018 - May 21, 2018 | -15.41% Nov 6, 2007 - Dec 12, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between BC and CE is 0.85 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
BC vs CE dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BC | CE |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.61% | 0.13% |
| 2025 | 2.32% | 0.28% |
| 2024 | 2.60% | 4.05% |
| 2023 | 1.65% | 1.80% |
| 2022 | 2.03% | 2.68% |
| 2021 | 1.27% | 1.62% |
| 2020 | 1.30% | 1.91% |
| 2019 | 1.45% | 1.95% |
| 2018 | 1.68% | 2.31% |
| 2017 | 1.24% | 1.62% |
| 2016 | 1.13% | 1.75% |
| 2015 | 1.04% | 1.71% |
| 2014 | 0.88% | 1.55% |
| 2013 | 0.22% | 0.95% |
| 2012 | 0.17% | 0.61% |
| 2011 | 0.28% | 0.50% |
| 2010 | 0.27% | 0.44% |
| 2009 | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| 2008 | 1.19% | 1.29% |
| 2007 | 3.52% | 0.38% |
| 2006 | 1.88% | 0.62% |
| 2005 | 1.48% | 0.42% |
| 2004 | 1.21% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.57% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 2.52% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 2.30% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 3.13% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.58% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks