BAP vs STZ
Comparison between Credicorp Ltd (BAP, Company) and Constellation Brands Inc - Class A (STZ, Company).
BAP is from the Financial Services sector, while STZ is from the Consumer Defensive sector.
5-Year PerformanceBAP has outperformed STZ, delivering a return of +26.0% compared to -7.0%
BAP vs STZ - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BAP vs STZ - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BAP vs STZ - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BAP | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +20.68% | +8.28% |
| 2025 | +64.72% | -36.43% |
| 2024 | +32.49% | -7.92% |
| 2023 | +14.25% | +7.76% |
| 2022 | +12.39% | -7.14% |
| 2021 | -21.66% | +17.35% |
| 2020 | -20.35% | +18.30% |
| 2019 | -2.35% | +17.51% |
| 2018 | +3.99% | -28.09% |
| 2017 | +34.80% | +49.28% |
| 2016 | +69.45% | +10.03% |
| 2015 | -38.03% | +47.20% |
| 2014 | +24.00% | +41.78% |
| 2013 | -9.54% | +87.38% |
| 2012 | +36.81% | +70.72% |
| 2011 | -6.73% | -4.35% |
| 2010 | +56.14% | +37.41% |
| 2009 | +56.69% | -3.16% |
| 2008 | -32.22% | -32.84% |
| 2007 | +87.36% | -16.76% |
| 2006 | +75.55% | +11.66% |
| 2005 | +51.20% | +12.91% |
| 2004 | +21.81% | +41.37% |
| 2003 | +44.34% | +33.70% |
| 2002 | +10.25% | +10.92% |
| 2001 | +51.09% | +50.35% |
| 2000 | -48.50% | +17.95% |
| 1999 | +12.89% | -13.01% |
BAP vs STZ Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BAP was -64.93%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 440 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for STZ was -64.97%, occurring on Nov 12, 2008. Recovery took 1797 trading sessions.
The current BAP drawdown is -7.89%. The current STZ drawdown is -41.65%.
| Rank | BAP | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -64.93% Jun 16, 2008 - Mar 16, 2010 | -64.97% Jun 28, 2005 - Aug 15, 2012 |
| #2 | -59.33% Mar 18, 2019 - Nov 18, 2024 | -53.52% Apr 27, 2018 - Jan 7, 2021 |
| #3 | -56.49% Jan 14, 2000 - Nov 25, 2003 | -51.28% Mar 27, 2024 - Nov 7, 2025 |
| #4 | -48.00% Dec 3, 2014 - Jan 10, 2017 | -31.25% Jun 28, 2002 - Nov 5, 2003 |
| #5 | -34.18% Nov 8, 2010 - Mar 1, 2012 | -28.92% Nov 5, 1999 - Jan 11, 2001 |
| #6 | -30.50% Mar 28, 2013 - Nov 4, 2014 | -21.59% Jan 29, 2013 - Feb 14, 2013 |
| #7 | -24.06% Oct 4, 2005 - Feb 27, 2006 | -21.32% Aug 20, 2001 - Jan 8, 2002 |
| #8 | -20.00% Jan 7, 2004 - Oct 6, 2004 | -20.06% Dec 2, 2022 - Jul 19, 2023 |
| #9 | -18.64% Feb 3, 2026 - May 18, 2026 | -16.31% Jan 4, 2022 - Apr 19, 2022 |
| #10 | -16.75% Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 17, 2007 | -16.00% Jul 31, 2023 - Mar 25, 2024 |
| #11 | -16.29% Apr 5, 2012 - Nov 9, 2012 | -15.07% Apr 5, 2001 - May 17, 2001 |
| #12 | -15.41% Nov 8, 2006 - Feb 9, 2007 | -15.02% May 7, 2002 - Jun 27, 2002 |
| #13 | -15.08% Jul 23, 2007 - Sep 27, 2007 | -14.91% Oct 10, 2016 - Apr 6, 2017 |
| #14 | -14.90% Feb 27, 2006 - May 9, 2006 | -14.16% Aug 25, 2022 - Nov 25, 2022 |
| #15 | -14.48% Nov 21, 2024 - Apr 28, 2025 | -13.93% Apr 12, 2005 - Jun 28, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between BAP and STZ is 0.75 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
BAP vs STZ dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BAP | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.42% | 1.36% |
| 2025 | 3.78% | 2.95% |
| 2024 | 6.65% | 1.77% |
| 2023 | 4.52% | 1.44% |
| 2022 | 2.84% | 1.36% |
| 2021 | 0.99% | 1.21% |
| 2020 | 5.37% | 1.37% |
| 2019 | 3.95% | 1.58% |
| 2018 | 0.20% | 1.70% |
| 2017 | 4.16% | 0.86% |
| 2016 | 1.47% | 0.98% |
| 2015 | 2.25% | 0.65% |
| 2014 | 1.19% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 1.96% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 1.57% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 1.78% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 1.43% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 1.95% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 3.00% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 1.70% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 2.69% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 3.51% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 2.53% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 2.25% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 2.13% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 3.43% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 1.67% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks