BAM vs CI
Comparison between Brookfield Asset Management Ltd - Class A (BAM, Company) and Cigna Group (The) (CI, Company).
BAM is from the Financial Services sector, while CI is from the Healthcare sector.
BAM vs CI - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BAM vs CI - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BAM vs CI - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BAM | CI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -11.04% | +3.82% |
| 2025 | -0.56% | +2.32% |
| 2024 | +44.51% | -9.48% |
| 2023 | +46.61% | -5.14% |
| 2022 | -10.41% | +43.83% |
| 2021 | N/A | +13.61% |
| 2020 | N/A | +1.60% |
| 2019 | N/A | +9.28% |
| 2018 | N/A | -6.22% |
| 2017 | N/A | +49.68% |
| 2016 | N/A | -8.95% |
| 2015 | N/A | +42.35% |
| 2014 | N/A | +19.45% |
| 2013 | N/A | +58.70% |
| 2012 | N/A | +23.78% |
| 2011 | N/A | +11.15% |
| 2010 | N/A | +0.92% |
| 2009 | N/A | +98.84% |
| 2008 | N/A | -68.86% |
| 2007 | N/A | +22.40% |
| 2006 | N/A | +17.26% |
| 2005 | N/A | +39.76% |
| 2004 | N/A | +43.22% |
| 2003 | N/A | +38.99% |
| 2002 | N/A | -54.53% |
| 2001 | N/A | -26.87% |
| 2000 | N/A | +71.09% |
| 1999 | N/A | +10.23% |
BAM vs CI Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BAM was -30.36%, occurring on Mar 24, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for CI was -84.34%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 1265 trading sessions.
The current BAM drawdown is -23.58%. The current CI drawdown is -19.05%.
| Rank | BAM | CI |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -30.36% Jul 24, 2025 - Mar 24, 2026 | -84.34% Jan 9, 2008 - Jan 17, 2013 |
| #2 | -29.54% Jan 29, 2025 - Jul 17, 2025 | -72.61% Dec 28, 2000 - Mar 10, 2006 |
| #3 | -20.47% Sep 15, 2023 - Dec 1, 2023 | -42.47% Jan 26, 2018 - Jan 20, 2021 |
| #4 | -17.87% Dec 2, 2022 - Feb 2, 2023 | -33.42% Mar 30, 2006 - Feb 1, 2007 |
| #5 | -13.12% Feb 15, 2023 - Aug 11, 2023 | -32.11% Sep 16, 2024 - Oct 31, 2025 |
| #6 | -12.04% Dec 11, 2024 - Jan 24, 2025 | -31.64% Jun 25, 2015 - Jun 19, 2017 |
| #7 | -11.72% Mar 21, 2024 - Jul 22, 2024 | -28.63% Nov 17, 1999 - May 18, 2000 |
| #8 | -11.57% Jul 31, 2024 - Sep 11, 2024 | -28.18% Dec 12, 2022 - Feb 9, 2024 |
| #9 | -8.01% Aug 14, 2023 - Sep 11, 2023 | -27.48% May 10, 2021 - Apr 20, 2022 |
| #10 | -6.41% Dec 27, 2023 - Jan 26, 2024 | -19.91% May 29, 2007 - Jan 9, 2008 |
| #11 | -4.84% Nov 11, 2024 - Nov 26, 2024 | -16.06% Aug 11, 2000 - Oct 2, 2000 |
| #12 | -4.61% Mar 7, 2024 - Mar 21, 2024 | -16.03% Jan 21, 2014 - May 29, 2014 |
| #13 | -4.58% Jan 29, 2024 - Feb 15, 2024 | -13.17% Sep 16, 2013 - Nov 19, 2013 |
| #14 | -2.84% Jul 22, 2024 - Jul 30, 2024 | -11.98% Apr 1, 2024 - Sep 3, 2024 |
| #15 | -2.50% Dec 1, 2023 - Dec 12, 2023 | -11.01% Jan 20, 2021 - Mar 5, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between BAM and CI is 0.13 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
BAM vs CI dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BAM | CI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.16% | 1.09% |
| 2025 | 3.34% | 2.19% |
| 2024 | 2.80% | 2.03% |
| 2023 | 3.19% | 1.64% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 1.35% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 1.74% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 0.02% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 0.02% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 0.02% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 0.02% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 0.03% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 0.03% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 0.04% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 0.05% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 0.07% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 0.10% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.11% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 0.11% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 0.24% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 0.07% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 0.08% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 0.09% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 0.50% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 2.30% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 3.21% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 1.38% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 0.94% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.37% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks