BAK vs CPF
Comparison between Braskem S.A. (BAK, Company) and Central Pacific Financial Corp (CPF, Company).
BAK is from the Basic Materials sector, while CPF is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceCPF has outperformed BAK, delivering a return of +13.9% compared to -34.1%
BAK vs CPF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BAK vs CPF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BAK vs CPF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BAK | CPF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -13.36% | +26.71% |
| 2025 | -26.25% | +18.26% |
| 2024 | -55.06% | +53.76% |
| 2023 | +6.39% | +2.37% |
| 2022 | -51.73% | -25.91% |
| 2021 | +170.06% | +57.46% |
| 2020 | -40.01% | -32.31% |
| 2019 | -36.28% | +22.05% |
| 2018 | -6.23% | -15.99% |
| 2017 | +22.41% | -2.11% |
| 2016 | +77.31% | +51.97% |
| 2015 | +10.64% | +8.67% |
| 2014 | -21.39% | +9.03% |
| 2013 | +29.82% | +27.39% |
| 2012 | -8.05% | +20.29% |
| 2011 | -41.76% | -59.62% |
| 2010 | +48.33% | +10.07% |
| 2009 | +232.19% | -86.94% |
| 2008 | -68.23% | -41.49% |
| 2007 | +14.03% | -51.17% |
| 2006 | -7.21% | +7.06% |
| 2005 | -33.57% | +3.01% |
| 2004 | +101.42% | +23.84% |
| 2003 | +630.94% | +10.24% |
| 2002 | -67.45% | +86.72% |
| 2001 | -30.24% | +12.51% |
| 2000 | -0.20% | -1.97% |
| 1999 | +76.44% | +14.83% |
BAK vs CPF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BAK was -90.12%, occurring on Jul 1, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for CPF was -98.74%, occurring on Oct 3, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current BAK drawdown is -89.36%. The current CPF drawdown is -91.86%.
| Rank | BAK | CPF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -90.12% Jan 22, 2018 - Jul 1, 2026 | -98.74% Feb 22, 2007 - Oct 3, 2011 |
| #2 | -88.41% Sep 6, 2000 - Dec 5, 2003 | -31.45% Jun 28, 2002 - Sep 18, 2002 |
| #3 | -83.96% Feb 8, 2005 - Dec 17, 2010 | -26.60% Dec 30, 1999 - Jan 29, 2001 |
| #4 | -78.10% Jun 7, 2011 - Sep 6, 2017 | -24.03% Dec 29, 2003 - Oct 6, 2004 |
| #5 | -56.82% Jan 12, 2004 - Sep 3, 2004 | -22.85% Aug 20, 2001 - Apr 12, 2002 |
| #6 | -29.47% Feb 14, 2000 - Jul 6, 2000 | -21.88% Jan 14, 2003 - Dec 29, 2003 |
| #7 | -17.82% Oct 30, 2017 - Jan 19, 2018 | -18.18% Feb 4, 2005 - Nov 11, 2005 |
| #8 | -16.94% Dec 31, 2004 - Feb 4, 2005 | -14.98% May 20, 2002 - Jun 28, 2002 |
| #9 | -14.75% Nov 22, 1999 - Dec 14, 1999 | -13.83% Jan 10, 2006 - May 5, 2006 |
| #10 | -12.31% Apr 27, 2011 - May 18, 2011 | -13.04% Dec 17, 2002 - Jan 14, 2003 |
| #11 | -9.83% Sep 8, 2004 - Sep 20, 2004 | -12.92% Apr 5, 2001 - Jun 28, 2001 |
| #12 | -9.64% Oct 4, 2004 - Oct 27, 2004 | -11.94% Jul 3, 2001 - Jul 31, 2001 |
| #13 | -8.89% Dec 27, 1999 - Jan 20, 2000 | -11.50% Jun 9, 2006 - Dec 27, 2006 |
| #14 | -8.88% Jan 26, 2011 - Mar 4, 2011 | -9.91% Nov 14, 2002 - Dec 6, 2002 |
| #15 | -8.57% Aug 1, 2000 - Sep 5, 2000 | -9.90% Feb 12, 2001 - Apr 5, 2001 |
Correlation
Correlation between BAK and CPF is -0.30 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
BAK vs CPF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BAK | CPF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 1.50% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 3.50% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 3.58% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 5.28% |
| 2022 | 7.70% | 5.13% |
| 2021 | 12.85% | 3.41% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 4.84% |
| 2019 | 14.46% | 3.04% |
| 2018 | 4.53% | 3.37% |
| 2017 | 2.87% | 2.35% |
| 2016 | 6.80% | 1.91% |
| 2015 | 2.67% | 3.72% |
| 2014 | 3.87% | 1.67% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 0.80% |
| 2012 | 4.35% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 7.29% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.07% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 15.63% | 6.97% |
| 2007 | 0.97% | 5.31% |
| 2006 | 5.04% | 2.27% |
| 2005 | 2.26% | 2.03% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.77% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 2.13% |
| 2002 | 11.13% | 1.46% |
| 2001 | 11.47% | 2.28% |
| 2000 | 6.13% | 2.19% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.49% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks