BAC-P-N vs UL
Comparison between Bank Of America Corp. PRF PERPETUAL USD Ser LL DpSh11000th (BAC-P-N, Company) and Unilever plc (UL, Company).
5-Year PerformanceUL has outperformed BAC-P-N, delivering a return of +3.3% compared to -1.2%
BAC-P-N vs UL - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BAC-P-N vs UL - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BAC-P-N vs UL - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BAC-P-N | UL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -4.76% | -0.45% |
| 2025 | +1.21% | +6.27% |
| 2024 | +6.36% | +20.89% |
| 2023 | +15.60% | -0.39% |
| 2022 | -22.54% | -3.25% |
| 2021 | +3.02% | -7.87% |
| 2020 | +9.12% | +9.34% |
| 2019 | +6.12% | +13.17% |
| 2018 | N/A | -1.50% |
| 2017 | N/A | +40.68% |
| 2016 | N/A | -0.48% |
| 2015 | N/A | +11.03% |
| 2014 | N/A | +5.07% |
| 2013 | N/A | +9.28% |
| 2012 | N/A | +17.91% |
| 2011 | N/A | +12.34% |
| 2010 | N/A | -0.05% |
| 2009 | N/A | +43.25% |
| 2008 | N/A | -36.02% |
| 2007 | N/A | +37.47% |
| 2006 | N/A | +28.54% |
| 2005 | N/A | +5.88% |
| 2004 | N/A | +9.30% |
| 2003 | N/A | +0.58% |
| 2002 | N/A | +17.38% |
| 2001 | N/A | -2.31% |
| 2000 | N/A | +16.01% |
| 1999 | N/A | -17.15% |
BAC-P-N vs UL Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BAC-P-N was -28.12%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 111 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for UL was -53.51%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 838 trading sessions.
The current BAC-P-N drawdown is -10.27%. The current UL drawdown is -13.18%.
| Rank | BAC-P-N | UL |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -28.12% Feb 11, 2020 - Jul 21, 2020 | -53.51% Dec 28, 2007 - Apr 27, 2011 |
| #2 | -24.99% Jun 23, 2021 - Sep 13, 2024 | -40.94% Nov 2, 1999 - Apr 30, 2002 |
| #3 | -14.88% Sep 26, 2024 - May 21, 2025 | -30.13% Sep 4, 2019 - Oct 5, 2020 |
| #4 | -5.50% Dec 21, 2020 - Apr 15, 2021 | -27.64% Nov 11, 2020 - Jun 4, 2024 |
| #5 | -4.27% Aug 20, 2020 - Nov 24, 2020 | -25.10% Feb 13, 2026 - Apr 2, 2026 |
| #6 | -2.42% Oct 25, 2019 - Dec 11, 2019 | -22.88% Feb 19, 2004 - May 23, 2005 |
| #7 | -2.34% May 5, 2021 - Jun 1, 2021 | -21.64% May 13, 2002 - Oct 31, 2002 |
| #8 | -2.02% Jan 2, 2020 - Feb 3, 2020 | -19.59% Sep 2, 2016 - Feb 17, 2017 |
| #9 | -1.17% Nov 25, 2020 - Dec 4, 2020 | -18.87% Apr 15, 2003 - Jan 8, 2004 |
| #10 | -0.62% Apr 27, 2021 - May 5, 2021 | -15.90% Sep 9, 2024 - Apr 22, 2025 |
| #11 | -0.59% Dec 9, 2020 - Dec 15, 2020 | -15.78% Nov 11, 2002 - Apr 15, 2003 |
| #12 | -0.56% Sep 12, 2019 - Sep 19, 2019 | -15.17% Aug 10, 2015 - Mar 29, 2016 |
| #13 | -0.55% Jun 14, 2021 - Jun 22, 2021 | -14.26% May 19, 2014 - Apr 16, 2015 |
| #14 | -0.44% Apr 16, 2021 - Apr 23, 2021 | -14.21% Sep 4, 2025 - Feb 11, 2026 |
| #15 | -0.44% Jun 4, 2021 - Jun 14, 2021 | -13.19% Oct 13, 2017 - Mar 20, 2019 |
Correlation
Correlation between BAC-P-N and UL is 0.63 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
BAC-P-N vs UL dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BAC-P-N | UL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.23% | 1.73% |
| 2025 | 6.02% | 3.51% |
| 2024 | 5.79% | 3.29% |
| 2023 | 5.81% | 3.83% |
| 2022 | 6.43% | 3.57% |
| 2021 | 4.70% | 3.77% |
| 2020 | 4.58% | 3.07% |
| 2019 | 1.19% | 3.18% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 3.49% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 2.80% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 3.42% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 3.02% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 4.65% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 3.39% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 3.17% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 3.70% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 3.61% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 4.96% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 4.31% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 2.64% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 4.29% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 3.60% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 3.67% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 2.96% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 2.36% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.31% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 0.72% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.30% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks