BAC-P-E vs LMT
Comparison between Bank Of America Corp (BAC-P-E, Company) and Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT, Company).
5-Year PerformanceLMT has outperformed BAC-P-E, delivering a return of +14.3% compared to -1.0%
BAC-P-E vs LMT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BAC-P-E vs LMT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BAC-P-E vs LMT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BAC-P-E | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.96% | +23.59% |
| 2025 | -16.25% | +3.27% |
| 2024 | +11.83% | +9.33% |
| 2023 | +30.80% | -2.52% |
| 2022 | -24.50% | +40.84% |
| 2021 | +5.64% | +6.29% |
| 2020 | +7.61% | -8.79% |
| 2019 | +27.06% | +50.87% |
| 2018 | -12.72% | -15.68% |
| 2017 | +12.91% | +30.00% |
| 2016 | +2.94% | +20.57% |
| 2015 | +15.34% | +15.74% |
| 2014 | +6.66% | +36.10% |
| 2013 | -3.71% | +66.25% |
| 2012 | +40.93% | +17.87% |
| 2011 | -8.39% | +20.76% |
| 2010 | +8.89% | -5.71% |
| 2009 | +62.61% | -9.17% |
| 2008 | -35.97% | -18.65% |
| 2007 | -15.97% | +16.16% |
| 2006 | -1.96% | +47.16% |
| 2005 | N/A | +19.38% |
| 2004 | N/A | +11.48% |
| 2003 | N/A | -11.58% |
| 2002 | N/A | +25.83% |
| 2001 | N/A | +38.37% |
| 2000 | N/A | +70.69% |
| 1999 | N/A | +9.87% |
BAC-P-E vs LMT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BAC-P-E was -84.61%, occurring on Feb 23, 2009. Recovery took 1065 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for LMT was -50.57%, occurring on Mar 11, 2009. Recovery took 1176 trading sessions.
The current BAC-P-E drawdown is -18.93%. The current LMT drawdown is -9.68%.
| Rank | BAC-P-E | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -84.61% Feb 28, 2007 - May 19, 2011 | -50.57% Aug 28, 2008 - May 2, 2013 |
| #2 | -35.27% May 19, 2011 - Feb 7, 2012 | -42.05% Jun 27, 2002 - Feb 1, 2006 |
| #3 | -29.06% Feb 6, 2020 - Jul 22, 2020 | -36.66% Feb 11, 2020 - Feb 28, 2022 |
| #4 | -27.13% Jul 30, 2021 - Jan 24, 2024 | -31.79% Oct 21, 2024 - Jan 22, 2026 |
| #5 | -23.29% Sep 4, 2018 - Aug 13, 2019 | -30.32% Feb 15, 2018 - Jun 4, 2019 |
| #6 | -20.98% May 17, 2013 - Nov 19, 2015 | -26.86% Mar 2, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026 |
| #7 | -20.37% Nov 5, 2024 - Dec 29, 2025 | -23.51% Dec 31, 1999 - Apr 12, 2000 |
| #8 | -17.84% Mar 8, 2012 - Sep 21, 2012 | -19.68% Apr 18, 2023 - Jul 23, 2024 |
| #9 | -17.36% Oct 17, 2016 - Jun 29, 2018 | -16.93% Apr 13, 2022 - Oct 27, 2022 |
| #10 | -8.30% Jan 5, 2016 - Apr 20, 2016 | -15.49% Oct 31, 2000 - Feb 1, 2001 |
| #11 | -5.87% Dec 1, 2015 - Dec 31, 2015 | -13.66% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 18, 1999 |
| #12 | -4.97% Jan 11, 2013 - Mar 12, 2013 | -12.93% Mar 7, 2001 - May 21, 2001 |
| #13 | -4.04% Oct 17, 2012 - Jan 7, 2013 | -12.90% Aug 15, 2016 - Nov 14, 2016 |
| #14 | -3.95% May 31, 2024 - Aug 15, 2024 | -12.74% May 1, 2000 - Jul 25, 2000 |
| #15 | -3.54% Jan 29, 2021 - Apr 6, 2021 | -11.80% Oct 26, 2001 - Jan 25, 2002 |
Correlation
Correlation between BAC-P-E and LMT is 0.91 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
BAC-P-E vs LMT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BAC-P-E | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.52% | 1.14% |
| 2025 | 6.67% | 2.76% |
| 2024 | 6.30% | 2.62% |
| 2023 | 6.04% | 2.68% |
| 2022 | 5.54% | 2.34% |
| 2021 | 3.97% | 2.98% |
| 2020 | 4.02% | 2.76% |
| 2019 | 5.70% | 2.31% |
| 2018 | 5.08% | 3.13% |
| 2017 | 4.26% | 2.32% |
| 2016 | 4.66% | 2.71% |
| 2015 | 4.53% | 2.83% |
| 2014 | 4.96% | 2.85% |
| 2013 | 5.04% | 3.22% |
| 2012 | 3.51% | 4.50% |
| 2011 | 6.33% | 4.02% |
| 2010 | 5.52% | 3.78% |
| 2009 | 5.68% | 3.11% |
| 2008 | 9.09% | 2.18% |
| 2007 | 7.46% | 1.40% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.36% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.65% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.64% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.13% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 0.76% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 0.94% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 1.30% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.01% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks