StockComparison Logo
vs

BABA vs GS

Comparison between Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA, Company) and Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS, Company).

BABA is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while GS is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceGS has outperformed BABA, delivering a return of +24.5% compared to -10.2%

BABA vs GS - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
BABA
$297B
GS
$294B
Max Drawdown
BABA
80.09%
Winner
GS
79.03%
Sharpe Ratio
BABA
0.20
Winner
GS
2.05
5Y Beta
Winner
BABA
0.88
GS
1.38
Industry
BABA
Internet Retail
GS
Capital Markets
P/E Ratio
BABA
19.77
Winner
GS
16.44
Forward P/E
BABA
20.04
Winner
GS
18.08
PEG Ratio
Winner
BABA
0.43
GS
0.61
Dividend Yield
BABA
0.83%
Winner
GS
1.42%
5Y Dividends CAGR
BABA
N/A
GS
27.73%
5Y EPS CAGR
BABA
-5.26%
Winner
GS
6.59%
Debt to Equity
BABA
0.00%
GS
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
BABA
3.72%
GS
-14.28%
P/S Ratio
Winner
BABA
0.30
GS
4.78
P/B Ratio
Winner
BABA
1.96
GS
2.69

BABA vs GS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
BABA
-8.48%
Winner
GS
+13.59%
3M
BABA
-7.14%
Winner
GS
+24.93%
6M
BABA
-23.55%
Winner
GS
+22.78%
1Y
BABA
+2.63%
Winner
GS
+74.95%
5Y(CAGR)
BABA
-10.25%
Winner
GS
+24.53%
10Y(CAGR)
BABA
+5.03%
Winner
GS
+23.32%
Max(CAGR)
BABA
+2.65%
Winner
GS
+12.27%

BABA vs GS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearBABAGS
2026-22.28%+14.75%
2025+75.51%+55.97%
2024+15.90%+51.03%
2023-14.58%+14.96%
2022-26.82%-10.84%
2021-47.86%+46.87%
2020+5.90%+15.28%
2019+55.16%+36.40%
2018-25.36%-33.76%
2017+94.62%+6.79%
2016+14.50%+37.26%
2015-21.55%-6.07%
2014+10.70%+11.02%
2013N/A+36.40%
2012N/A+35.95%
2011N/A-47.13%
2010N/A-1.92%
2009N/A+97.00%
2008N/A-58.99%
2007N/A+7.85%
2006N/A+56.00%
2005N/A+22.81%
2004N/A+8.25%
2003N/A+43.04%
2002N/A-24.73%
2001N/A-7.04%
2000N/A+21.66%
1999N/A+35.76%

BABA vs GS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for BABA was -80.09%, occurring on Oct 24, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for GS was -78.84%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 2288 trading sessions.

The current BABA drawdown is -59.79%. The current GS drawdown is -4.88%.

RankBABAGS
#1-80.09%
Oct 27, 2020 - Oct 24, 2022
-78.84%
Oct 31, 2007 - Dec 1, 2016
#2-51.83%
Nov 10, 2014 - May 9, 2017
-54.58%
Sep 11, 2000 - Nov 1, 2005
#3-38.06%
Jun 14, 2018 - Dec 20, 2019
-48.75%
Mar 12, 2018 - Dec 28, 2020
#4-23.49%
Jan 13, 2020 - Jul 6, 2020
-42.37%
Mar 24, 2000 - Aug 28, 2000
#5-18.37%
Jan 26, 2018 - Jun 4, 2018
-32.82%
Nov 2, 2021 - Mar 20, 2024
#6-11.63%
Nov 24, 2017 - Jan 23, 2018
-30.91%
Feb 18, 2025 - Jun 25, 2025
#7-10.22%
Sep 1, 2020 - Oct 8, 2020
-29.29%
Jun 13, 2007 - Oct 9, 2007
#8-9.52%
Sep 19, 2014 - Oct 23, 2014
-19.43%
Jan 15, 2026 - May 20, 2026
#9-7.95%
Oct 11, 2017 - Oct 31, 2017
-17.48%
Apr 20, 2006 - Sep 22, 2006
#10-7.29%
Jul 9, 2020 - Aug 4, 2020
-16.17%
Mar 3, 2017 - Dec 4, 2017
#11-7.25%
Sep 19, 2017 - Oct 9, 2017
-15.39%
Dec 31, 1999 - Mar 1, 2000
#12-6.61%
Aug 6, 2020 - Aug 21, 2020
-14.00%
Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 23, 2007
#13-5.25%
Jun 8, 2017 - Jun 21, 2017
-11.92%
Jan 14, 2021 - Feb 16, 2021
#14-4.77%
Aug 23, 2017 - Sep 13, 2017
-10.89%
Jun 4, 2021 - Aug 6, 2021
#15-4.50%
Aug 7, 2017 - Aug 16, 2017
-10.42%
Aug 27, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021

Correlation

Correlation between BABA and GS is -0.05 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.

-0.05
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

BABA vs GS dividend yield comparison.

YearBABAGS
20260.00%0.87%
20251.36%1.59%
20241.96%2.01%
20231.29%2.72%
20220.00%2.62%
20210.00%1.70%
20200.00%1.90%
20190.00%1.80%
20180.00%1.89%
20170.00%1.14%
20160.00%1.09%
20150.00%1.41%
20140.00%1.16%
20130.00%1.16%
20120.00%1.39%
20110.00%1.55%
20100.00%0.83%
20090.00%0.90%
20080.00%1.66%
20070.00%0.65%
20060.00%0.65%
20050.00%0.78%
20040.00%0.96%
20030.00%0.75%
20020.00%0.74%
20010.00%0.52%
20000.00%0.45%

Select Stocks to Compare