ATO vs CQP
Comparison between Atmos Energy Corp (ATO, Company) and Cheniere Energy Partners LP (CQP, Company).
ATO is from the Utilities sector, while CQP is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceCQP has outperformed ATO, delivering a return of +15.4% compared to +14.7%
ATO vs CQP - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
ATO vs CQP - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
ATO vs CQP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | ATO | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +7.41% | +16.48% |
| 2025 | +23.95% | +1.85% |
| 2024 | +22.26% | +9.37% |
| 2023 | +6.99% | -1.11% |
| 2022 | +9.35% | +44.85% |
| 2021 | +14.42% | +29.47% |
| 2020 | -11.55% | -4.20% |
| 2019 | +27.08% | +17.88% |
| 2018 | +11.48% | +29.23% |
| 2017 | +17.77% | +7.48% |
| 2016 | +21.72% | +19.44% |
| 2015 | +16.00% | -15.36% |
| 2014 | +28.60% | +19.27% |
| 2013 | +31.33% | +41.07% |
| 2012 | +10.40% | +26.60% |
| 2011 | +10.26% | -8.85% |
| 2010 | +10.83% | +74.14% |
| 2009 | +28.15% | +242.49% |
| 2008 | -10.92% | -73.00% |
| 2007 | -9.17% | -22.58% |
| 2006 | +24.81% | N/A |
| 2005 | +2.83% | N/A |
| 2004 | +16.09% | N/A |
| 2003 | +8.60% | N/A |
| 2002 | +14.61% | N/A |
| 2001 | -11.18% | N/A |
| 2000 | +28.93% | N/A |
| 1999 | -10.02% | N/A |
ATO vs CQP Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for ATO was -34.51%, occurring on Apr 24, 2000. Recovery took 195 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CQP was -78.51%, occurring on Dec 31, 2008. Recovery took 686 trading sessions.
The current ATO drawdown is -5.91%. The current CQP drawdown is -11.62%.
| Rank | ATO | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -34.51% Nov 4, 1999 - Aug 14, 2000 | -78.51% Apr 17, 2007 - Jan 5, 2010 |
| #2 | -32.91% Feb 18, 2020 - Mar 4, 2022 | -60.29% Sep 16, 2019 - Mar 11, 2021 |
| #3 | -32.75% May 22, 2007 - Oct 19, 2009 | -46.98% Jan 13, 2011 - Feb 27, 2012 |
| #4 | -24.38% Dec 27, 2000 - Jan 6, 2003 | -37.91% Jun 23, 2015 - Jan 26, 2017 |
| #5 | -19.08% Apr 20, 2022 - Jul 12, 2023 | -31.58% Apr 27, 2012 - Mar 22, 2013 |
| #6 | -16.88% Jul 26, 2023 - Jul 16, 2024 | -29.08% Nov 30, 2022 - Nov 2, 2023 |
| #7 | -16.62% Mar 8, 2011 - Sep 8, 2011 | -27.92% May 4, 2022 - Aug 25, 2022 |
| #8 | -15.86% Aug 17, 2000 - Oct 31, 2000 | -24.86% Nov 30, 2023 - Dec 2, 2024 |
| #9 | -15.45% Nov 30, 2017 - Jul 3, 2018 | -24.25% Apr 23, 2010 - Jul 20, 2010 |
| #10 | -14.73% Jun 30, 2016 - Mar 15, 2017 | -23.60% Apr 1, 2025 - Mar 5, 2026 |
| #11 | -14.07% Nov 29, 2000 - Dec 27, 2000 | -19.63% May 30, 2014 - Apr 30, 2015 |
| #12 | -14.00% May 20, 2013 - Aug 1, 2013 | -19.24% Mar 4, 2022 - May 4, 2022 |
| #13 | -12.84% Aug 31, 2005 - Jul 11, 2006 | -19.17% May 31, 2013 - Jul 23, 2013 |
| #14 | -12.44% Jan 6, 2003 - May 23, 2003 | -17.85% May 25, 2017 - May 4, 2018 |
| #15 | -12.07% Aug 1, 2013 - Nov 8, 2013 | -17.49% Sep 27, 2018 - Jan 17, 2019 |
Correlation
Correlation between ATO and CQP is 0.96 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
ATO vs CQP dividend yield comparison.
| Year | ATO | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.55% | 1.34% |
| 2025 | 2.15% | 6.15% |
| 2024 | 2.36% | 5.06% |
| 2023 | 2.61% | 8.36% |
| 2022 | 2.48% | 6.82% |
| 2021 | 2.44% | 6.30% |
| 2020 | 2.46% | 7.28% |
| 2019 | 1.92% | 6.08% |
| 2018 | 2.14% | 6.07% |
| 2017 | 2.14% | 5.79% |
| 2016 | 2.31% | 5.90% |
| 2015 | 2.52% | 6.52% |
| 2014 | 2.69% | 5.31% |
| 2013 | 3.13% | 5.93% |
| 2012 | 3.94% | 8.00% |
| 2011 | 4.09% | 9.43% |
| 2010 | 4.31% | 7.98% |
| 2009 | 4.51% | 13.17% |
| 2008 | 5.51% | 45.82% |
| 2007 | 4.58% | 5.47% |
| 2006 | 3.96% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 4.76% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 4.48% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 4.96% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 5.08% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 5.48% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 4.63% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 1.37% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks