ARMK vs CSL
Comparison between Aramark (ARMK, Company) and Carlisle Companies Inc (CSL, Company).
Both ARMK and CSL are from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceARMK has outperformed CSL, delivering a return of +16.9% compared to +14.0%
ARMK vs CSL - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
ARMK vs CSL - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
ARMK vs CSL - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | ARMK | CSL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +46.84% | +5.99% |
| 2025 | +0.81% | -11.66% |
| 2024 | +35.04% | +20.08% |
| 2023 | -4.85% | +35.04% |
| 2022 | +12.60% | -3.01% |
| 2021 | -1.09% | +62.98% |
| 2020 | -10.29% | -3.31% |
| 2019 | +49.41% | +62.36% |
| 2018 | -32.33% | -12.87% |
| 2017 | +24.66% | +5.48% |
| 2016 | +11.66% | +29.32% |
| 2015 | +5.87% | -0.33% |
| 2014 | +24.17% | +16.22% |
| 2013 | +15.51% | +32.88% |
| 2012 | N/A | +30.90% |
| 2011 | N/A | +11.21% |
| 2010 | N/A | +15.36% |
| 2009 | N/A | +64.68% |
| 2008 | N/A | -43.52% |
| 2007 | N/A | -5.44% |
| 2006 | N/A | +13.24% |
| 2005 | N/A | +10.86% |
| 2004 | N/A | +8.11% |
| 2003 | N/A | +44.81% |
| 2002 | N/A | +17.03% |
| 2001 | N/A | -9.48% |
| 2000 | N/A | +26.79% |
| 1999 | N/A | +10.53% |
ARMK vs CSL Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for ARMK was -72.27%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 751 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CSL was -64.55%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 918 trading sessions.
The current ARMK drawdown is -1.77%. The current CSL drawdown is -26.59%.
| Rank | ARMK | CSL |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -72.27% Jan 22, 2020 - Jan 13, 2023 | -64.55% Sep 4, 2007 - Apr 26, 2011 |
| #2 | -39.55% Jan 26, 2018 - Nov 19, 2019 | -45.55% Jun 29, 2000 - Oct 8, 2003 |
| #3 | -27.63% Nov 26, 2024 - Jun 26, 2025 | -39.12% May 10, 2011 - Feb 21, 2012 |
| #4 | -26.25% Jan 17, 2023 - Mar 12, 2024 | -38.68% Jan 2, 2020 - Mar 25, 2021 |
| #5 | -18.15% Jul 23, 2025 - Apr 14, 2026 | -37.71% Oct 14, 2024 - Nov 20, 2025 |
| #6 | -14.85% Mar 21, 2014 - Nov 28, 2014 | -34.51% Aug 18, 2022 - Dec 15, 2023 |
| #7 | -13.97% Aug 19, 2015 - Dec 2, 2015 | -27.39% Aug 29, 2018 - Apr 18, 2019 |
| #8 | -13.24% Sep 7, 2016 - Jun 1, 2017 | -25.34% Aug 17, 2015 - Apr 27, 2016 |
| #9 | -12.37% Dec 4, 2015 - Apr 18, 2016 | -19.70% May 18, 2005 - Feb 9, 2006 |
| #10 | -9.84% Dec 31, 2013 - Feb 10, 2014 | -19.47% Nov 25, 2016 - Nov 29, 2017 |
| #11 | -8.96% Nov 3, 2017 - Jan 10, 2018 | -17.69% Jan 8, 2018 - Jul 25, 2018 |
| #12 | -7.60% May 10, 2016 - Jul 8, 2016 | -15.01% May 4, 2022 - Jul 28, 2022 |
| #13 | -7.51% May 14, 2024 - Jun 10, 2024 | -14.86% Jun 10, 2014 - Oct 30, 2014 |
| #14 | -7.37% Mar 10, 2014 - Mar 21, 2014 | -14.45% Jul 16, 2024 - Sep 23, 2024 |
| #15 | -6.94% Nov 28, 2014 - Dec 23, 2014 | -13.99% Jul 16, 2004 - Feb 3, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between ARMK and CSL is 0.79 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
ARMK vs CSL dividend yield comparison.
| Year | ARMK | CSL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.45% | 0.64% |
| 2025 | 1.18% | 1.31% |
| 2024 | 1.05% | 1.00% |
| 2023 | 1.19% | 1.02% |
| 2022 | 1.06% | 1.09% |
| 2021 | 1.19% | 0.86% |
| 2020 | 1.14% | 1.31% |
| 2019 | 1.01% | 1.11% |
| 2018 | 1.47% | 1.53% |
| 2017 | 0.97% | 1.27% |
| 2016 | 1.09% | 1.18% |
| 2015 | 1.10% | 1.24% |
| 2014 | 1.00% | 1.04% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 1.29% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 1.58% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 1.66% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 1.84% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 2.90% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 1.51% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.32% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.39% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.39% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.43% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 2.05% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 1.77% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.50% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks