AOSL vs LQDT

Comparison between Alpha & Omega Semiconductor Ltd (AOSL, Company) and Liquidity Services Inc (LQDT, Company).

AOSL is from the Technology sector, while LQDT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceLQDT has outperformed AOSL, delivering a return of +12.6% compared to +11.5%

AOSL vs LQDT - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	AOSL(COMPANY)	LQDT(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$1.44B	$1.44B
Max Drawdown	75.27%	95.31%
Sharpe Ratio	1.25	1.45
5Y Beta	2.80	0.77
Industry	Semiconductors	Internet Retail
P/E Ratio	-13.54	46.96
Forward P/E	8.26	23.53
PEG Ratio	-0.04	2.65
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	12.50%
Debt to Equity	0.55%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-4.20%	5.42%

Market Cap

Winner

AOSL

$1.44B

LQDT

$1.44B

Max Drawdown

Winner

AOSL

75.27%

LQDT

95.31%

Sharpe Ratio

AOSL

1.25

Winner

LQDT

1.45

5Y Beta

AOSL

2.80

Winner

LQDT

0.77

Industry

AOSL

Semiconductors

LQDT

Internet Retail

P/E Ratio

Winner

AOSL

-13.54

LQDT

46.96

Forward P/E

Winner

AOSL

8.26

LQDT

23.53

PEG Ratio

Winner

AOSL

-0.04

LQDT

2.65

5Y EPS CAGR

AOSL

N/A

LQDT

12.50%

Debt to Equity

AOSL

0.55%

Winner

LQDT

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

AOSL

-4.20%

Winner

LQDT

5.42%

AOSL vs LQDT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	AOSL	LQDT
1 month	+24.67%	+11.84%
3 months	+127.35%	+34.79%
6 months	+139.00%	+19.45%
1 year	+96.89%	+62.48%
5 years(CAGR)	+11.54%	+12.56%
10 years(CAGR)	+12.98%	+18.03%
Max(CAGR)	+6.38%	+5.89%

Winner

AOSL

+24.67%

LQDT

+11.84%

Winner

AOSL

+127.35%

LQDT

+34.79%

Winner

AOSL

+139.00%

LQDT

+19.45%

Winner

AOSL

+96.89%

LQDT

+62.48%

5Y(CAGR)

AOSL

+11.54%

Winner

LQDT

+12.56%

10Y(CAGR)

AOSL

+12.98%

Winner

LQDT

+18.03%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

AOSL

+6.38%

LQDT

+5.89%

AOSL vs LQDT - Annual Returns (2006 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	AOSL	LQDT
2026	+132.53%	+28.05%
2025	-45.79%	-5.16%
2024	+35.24%	+88.50%
2023	-11.12%	+21.97%
2022	-54.07%	-36.75%
2021	+147.28%	+35.79%
2020	+72.81%	+174.31%
2019	+29.22%	-7.88%
2018	-39.49%	+31.28%
2017	-24.29%	-50.76%
2016	+141.43%	+49.08%
2015	+3.96%	-18.34%
2014	+16.75%	-63.62%
2013	-14.24%	-45.66%
2012	+4.87%	+8.96%
2011	-44.79%	+155.19%
2010	-27.51%	+38.42%
2009	N/A	+18.47%
2008	N/A	-33.84%
2007	N/A	-26.95%
2006	N/A	+45.23%

AOSL vs LQDT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for AOSL was -75.27%, occurring on Apr 21, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for LQDT was -95.31%, occurring on Mar 27, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current AOSL drawdown is -26.90%. The current LQDT drawdown is -41.94%.

Rank	AOSL	LQDT
#1	-75.27% Mar 24, 2022 - Apr 21, 2025	-95.31% May 9, 2012 - Mar 27, 2020
#2	-74.90% Nov 28, 2016 - Nov 23, 2020	-79.68% Feb 12, 2007 - Jun 23, 2011
#3	-61.86% Apr 30, 2010 - Aug 11, 2016	-53.04% May 31, 2006 - Nov 13, 2006
#4	-39.56% Feb 12, 2021 - Nov 5, 2021	-27.94% Aug 3, 2011 - Sep 1, 2011
#5	-34.85% Jan 3, 2022 - Mar 22, 2022	-20.38% Nov 20, 2006 - Feb 8, 2007
#6	-20.10% Sep 8, 2016 - Nov 28, 2016	-19.83% Sep 28, 2011 - Dec 6, 2011
#7	-19.50% Dec 7, 2020 - Jan 7, 2021	-15.03% May 5, 2006 - May 26, 2006
#8	-12.80% Jan 22, 2021 - Feb 1, 2021	-14.41% Jan 10, 2012 - Feb 13, 2012
#9	-10.54% Dec 7, 2021 - Dec 23, 2021	-12.97% Sep 16, 2011 - Sep 28, 2011
#10	-7.53% Nov 22, 2021 - Nov 30, 2021	-8.67% Sep 6, 2011 - Sep 15, 2011
#11	-7.09% Dec 2, 2021 - Dec 7, 2021	-8.65% Mar 24, 2006 - Apr 19, 2006
#12	-6.68% Jan 12, 2021 - Jan 21, 2021	-7.57% Mar 26, 2012 - Apr 5, 2012
#13	-5.81% Feb 4, 2021 - Feb 11, 2021	-6.75% Dec 16, 2011 - Jan 10, 2012
#14	-4.90% Mar 22, 2022 - Mar 24, 2022	-6.64% Jul 20, 2011 - Aug 2, 2011
#15	-4.42% Dec 27, 2021 - Dec 29, 2021	-6.55% Feb 27, 2012 - Mar 9, 2012