AM vs FLS
Comparison between Antero Midstream Corp (AM, Company) and Flowserve Corp (FLS, Company).
AM is from the Energy sector, while FLS is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceAM has outperformed FLS, delivering a return of +26.6% compared to +17.0%
AM vs FLS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
AM vs FLS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
AM vs FLS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | AM | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +22.38% | +13.69% |
| 2025 | +21.21% | +22.83% |
| 2024 | +27.60% | +44.37% |
| 2023 | +28.56% | +35.29% |
| 2022 | +19.43% | +1.67% |
| 2021 | +41.21% | -10.02% |
| 2020 | +36.44% | -25.24% |
| 2019 | -61.16% | +33.08% |
| 2018 | -22.67% | -9.01% |
| 2017 | -1.33% | -12.92% |
| 2016 | +46.37% | +16.21% |
| 2015 | -14.37% | -28.37% |
| 2014 | -1.89% | -19.84% |
| 2013 | N/A | +58.24% |
| 2012 | N/A | +45.71% |
| 2011 | N/A | -16.36% |
| 2010 | N/A | +24.27% |
| 2009 | N/A | +74.34% |
| 2008 | N/A | -44.96% |
| 2007 | N/A | +89.63% |
| 2006 | N/A | +23.37% |
| 2005 | N/A | +47.28% |
| 2004 | N/A | +32.28% |
| 2003 | N/A | +36.92% |
| 2002 | N/A | -44.00% |
| 2001 | N/A | +28.99% |
| 2000 | N/A | +30.05% |
| 1999 | N/A | -1.38% |
AM vs FLS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for AM was -92.96%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 1594 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for FLS was -77.36%, occurring on Oct 10, 2002. Recovery took 819 trading sessions.
The current AM drawdown is -8.08%. The current FLS drawdown is -12.61%.
| Rank | AM | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -92.96% Oct 10, 2018 - Feb 13, 2025 | -77.36% May 2, 2002 - Aug 2, 2005 |
| #2 | -41.86% Jun 18, 2015 - Oct 14, 2016 | -73.54% Apr 2, 2014 - Oct 29, 2025 |
| #3 | -28.89% Aug 2, 2017 - Aug 2, 2018 | -73.10% Jul 21, 2008 - Sep 14, 2012 |
| #4 | -28.31% Nov 12, 2014 - Jun 2, 2015 | -41.25% May 22, 2001 - Apr 25, 2002 |
| #5 | -16.23% Aug 2, 2018 - Oct 9, 2018 | -40.31% Nov 18, 1999 - Aug 22, 2000 |
| #6 | -15.30% Feb 10, 2017 - Aug 2, 2017 | -29.83% Feb 25, 2026 - May 19, 2026 |
| #7 | -13.98% Apr 2, 2025 - May 13, 2025 | -21.25% May 10, 2006 - Apr 24, 2007 |
| #8 | -12.67% Mar 25, 2026 - Apr 21, 2026 | -20.62% Dec 13, 2007 - Feb 20, 2008 |
| #9 | -11.32% Sep 26, 2025 - Feb 6, 2026 | -17.19% Aug 8, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007 |
| #10 | -10.21% Oct 27, 2016 - Dec 22, 2016 | -17.08% Jun 16, 2008 - Jul 14, 2008 |
| #11 | -9.98% Jun 2, 2025 - Sep 22, 2025 | -16.74% Mar 7, 2001 - Apr 17, 2001 |
| #12 | -6.05% Oct 21, 2016 - Oct 27, 2016 | -15.47% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 7, 2008 |
| #13 | -5.53% Feb 13, 2025 - Feb 28, 2025 | -15.35% Dec 12, 2000 - Dec 27, 2000 |
| #14 | -4.06% Mar 5, 2025 - Mar 14, 2025 | -13.80% Sep 6, 2000 - Oct 30, 2000 |
| #15 | -3.39% Jun 3, 2015 - Jun 12, 2015 | -11.57% Dec 31, 2013 - Feb 19, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between AM and FLS is 0.77 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
AM vs FLS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | AM | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.18% | 0.55% |
| 2025 | 5.06% | 1.21% |
| 2024 | 5.96% | 1.46% |
| 2023 | 7.18% | 1.94% |
| 2022 | 8.34% | 2.61% |
| 2021 | 10.15% | 2.61% |
| 2020 | 15.95% | 2.17% |
| 2019 | 18.28% | 1.91% |
| 2018 | 7.53% | 2.00% |
| 2017 | 4.27% | 1.35% |
| 2016 | 3.14% | 1.58% |
| 2015 | 2.93% | 1.71% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 4.41% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 1.24% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 0.98% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 1.29% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.97% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 1.14% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 1.94% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 0.62% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.82% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks