ALB vs TU
Comparison between Albemarle Corp (ALB, Company) and Telus Corp (TU, Company).
ALB is from the Basic Materials sector, while TU is from the Communication Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceALB has outperformed TU, delivering a return of -1.1% compared to -7.1%
ALB vs TU - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
ALB vs TU - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
ALB vs TU - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | ALB | TU |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.23% | -10.09% |
| 2025 | +69.37% | +4.57% |
| 2024 | -40.46% | -18.87% |
| 2023 | -32.07% | -2.16% |
| 2022 | -7.76% | -14.39% |
| 2021 | +54.41% | +23.83% |
| 2020 | +106.78% | +7.03% |
| 2019 | -4.60% | +21.95% |
| 2018 | -40.58% | -8.14% |
| 2017 | +46.84% | +24.89% |
| 2016 | +57.51% | +23.85% |
| 2015 | -4.95% | -18.53% |
| 2014 | -3.13% | +9.58% |
| 2013 | +0.06% | +9.43% |
| 2012 | +19.42% | +26.46% |
| 2011 | -6.62% | +28.10% |
| 2010 | +48.29% | +44.95% |
| 2009 | +60.40% | +16.56% |
| 2008 | -44.46% | -38.58% |
| 2007 | +15.81% | +13.05% |
| 2006 | +77.63% | +11.84% |
| 2005 | +2.50% | +45.43% |
| 2004 | +30.33% | +54.21% |
| 2003 | +7.05% | +85.03% |
| 2002 | +21.26% | -21.96% |
| 2001 | +5.14% | -38.82% |
| 2000 | +40.63% | +15.51% |
| 1999 | +0.87% | +21.85% |
ALB vs TU Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for ALB was -83.90%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for TU was -88.30%, occurring on Jul 26, 2002. Recovery took 1085 trading sessions.
The current ALB drawdown is -52.17%. The current TU drawdown is -45.25%.
| Rank | ALB | TU |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -83.90% Nov 11, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025 | -88.30% Aug 22, 2000 - Dec 17, 2004 |
| #2 | -66.29% Oct 31, 2007 - Apr 29, 2010 | -59.59% Jun 4, 2007 - Apr 21, 2011 |
| #3 | -63.27% Nov 8, 2017 - Nov 27, 2020 | -45.25% Apr 8, 2022 - Jun 24, 2026 |
| #4 | -44.82% May 10, 2011 - Nov 27, 2013 | -33.66% Feb 12, 2020 - Dec 9, 2020 |
| #5 | -41.04% Jul 14, 2014 - May 11, 2016 | -31.02% Nov 18, 2014 - May 22, 2017 |
| #6 | -39.26% Nov 22, 2021 - Aug 15, 2022 | -22.54% May 10, 2013 - Mar 27, 2014 |
| #7 | -30.91% Jun 10, 2002 - Jun 29, 2004 | -22.08% Oct 31, 2006 - Apr 20, 2007 |
| #8 | -30.70% Dec 28, 2000 - Mar 4, 2002 | -19.49% Apr 3, 2000 - Jul 18, 2000 |
| #9 | -26.73% Aug 16, 2000 - Dec 28, 2000 | -16.19% Jul 31, 2000 - Aug 22, 2000 |
| #10 | -24.92% Nov 15, 1999 - Mar 20, 2000 | -16.09% Jul 15, 2011 - Jan 3, 2012 |
| #11 | -24.05% Jan 19, 2021 - Jul 12, 2021 | -11.80% Jun 16, 2014 - Nov 17, 2014 |
| #12 | -22.55% Sep 14, 2022 - Nov 10, 2022 | -11.31% Sep 13, 2018 - Mar 26, 2019 |
| #13 | -20.14% Apr 23, 2007 - Sep 26, 2007 | -11.31% Jan 3, 2006 - Mar 16, 2006 |
| #14 | -18.86% Dec 1, 2004 - Jan 3, 2006 | -10.87% May 2, 2006 - Aug 1, 2006 |
| #15 | -15.62% Apr 29, 2010 - Sep 30, 2010 | -10.74% Sep 23, 2005 - Jan 3, 2006 |
Correlation
Correlation between ALB and TU is 0.87 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
ALB vs TU dividend yield comparison.
| Year | ALB | TU |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.55% | 5.47% |
| 2025 | 1.15% | 9.01% |
| 2024 | 1.87% | 8.35% |
| 2023 | 1.11% | 6.02% |
| 2022 | 0.73% | 5.39% |
| 2021 | 0.67% | 4.31% |
| 2020 | 1.04% | 4.51% |
| 2019 | 2.01% | 4.37% |
| 2018 | 1.74% | 5.19% |
| 2017 | 1.00% | 5.20% |
| 2016 | 1.42% | 5.78% |
| 2015 | 2.07% | 6.08% |
| 2014 | 1.83% | 4.22% |
| 2013 | 1.51% | 3.95% |
| 2012 | 1.29% | 3.75% |
| 2011 | 1.30% | 4.12% |
| 2010 | 1.00% | 4.59% |
| 2009 | 1.37% | 6.10% |
| 2008 | 2.15% | 6.42% |
| 2007 | 1.02% | 3.93% |
| 2006 | 0.96% | 3.23% |
| 2005 | 1.62% | 2.48% |
| 2004 | 1.51% | 2.63% |
| 2003 | 1.89% | 3.76% |
| 2002 | 1.90% | 6.70% |
| 2001 | 2.17% | 9.90% |
| 2000 | 1.86% | 4.54% |
| 1999 | 0.52% | 1.01% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks