AGM vs SHAK

Comparison between Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corp - Class C (AGM, Company) and Shake Shack Inc - Class A (SHAK, Company).

AGM is from the Financial Services sector, while SHAK is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceAGM has outperformed SHAK, delivering a return of +20.5% compared to -10.8%

AGM vs SHAK - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	AGM(COMPANY)	SHAK(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$2.25B	$2.25B
Max Drawdown	94.96%	70.89%
Sharpe Ratio	0.71	-1.38
5Y Beta	0.76	1.45
Industry	Credit Services	Restaurants
P/E Ratio	10.37	66.96
Forward P/E	10.52	50.51
PEG Ratio	2.41	0.26
Dividend Yield	2.94%	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	18.04%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	12.53%	0.06%
Debt to Equity	1879.86%	47.15%
Free Cash Flow Yield	9.84%	0.71%
P/S Ratio	5.86	1.60
P/B Ratio	1.86	4.33

Market Cap

Winner

AGM

$2.25B

SHAK

$2.25B

Max Drawdown

AGM

94.96%

Winner

SHAK

70.89%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

AGM

0.71

SHAK

-1.38

5Y Beta

Winner

AGM

0.76

SHAK

1.45

Industry

AGM

Credit Services

SHAK

Restaurants

P/E Ratio

Winner

AGM

10.37

SHAK

66.96

Forward P/E

Winner

AGM

10.52

SHAK

50.51

PEG Ratio

AGM

2.41

Winner

SHAK

0.26

Dividend Yield

AGM

2.94%

SHAK

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

AGM

18.04%

SHAK

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

Winner

AGM

12.53%

SHAK

0.06%

Debt to Equity

AGM

1879.86%

Winner

SHAK

47.15%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

AGM

9.84%

SHAK

0.71%

P/S Ratio

AGM

5.86

Winner

SHAK

1.60

P/B Ratio

Winner

AGM

1.86

SHAK

4.33

AGM vs SHAK - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	AGM	SHAK
1 month	+8.55%	+4.29%
3 months	+21.76%	-44.57%
6 months	+24.53%	-38.10%
1 year	+24.24%	-57.30%
5 years(CAGR)	+20.49%	-10.78%
10 years(CAGR)	+22.36%	+3.38%
Max(CAGR)	+11.82%	+1.92%

Winner

AGM

+8.55%

SHAK

+4.29%

Winner

AGM

+21.76%

SHAK

-44.57%

Winner

AGM

+24.53%

SHAK

-38.10%

Winner

AGM

+24.24%

SHAK

-57.30%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

AGM

+20.49%

SHAK

-10.78%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

AGM

+22.36%

SHAK

+3.38%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

AGM

+11.82%

SHAK

+1.92%

AGM vs SHAK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	AGM	SHAK
2026	+20.85%	-31.59%
2025	-5.68%	-39.09%
2024	+8.52%	+77.06%
2023	+73.33%	+77.83%
2022	-6.30%	-44.31%
2021	+71.49%	-12.46%
2020	-6.50%	+38.69%
2019	+38.02%	+33.71%
2018	-21.00%	+3.98%
2017	+37.98%	+19.57%
2016	+86.28%	-7.16%
2015	+11.02%	-13.73%
2014	-5.53%	N/A
2013	+4.16%	N/A
2012	+78.92%	N/A
2011	+10.01%	N/A
2010	+132.73%	N/A
2009	+89.12%	N/A
2008	-85.78%	N/A
2007	-3.33%	N/A
2006	-9.14%	N/A
2005	+30.39%	N/A
2004	-24.66%	N/A
2003	+0.98%	N/A
2002	-21.36%	N/A
2001	+60.78%	N/A
2000	+21.08%	N/A
1999	+8.43%	N/A

AGM vs SHAK Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for AGM was -94.63%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 3561 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for SHAK was -70.89%, occurring on Jun 16, 2022. Recovery took 940 trading sessions.

The current SHAK drawdown is -59.80%.

Rank	AGM	SHAK
#1	-94.63% Jan 28, 2002 - Mar 21, 2016	-70.89% Feb 11, 2021 - Nov 6, 2024
#2	-53.32% Jul 26, 2018 - Mar 3, 2021	-68.92% Sep 4, 2019 - Jan 13, 2021
#3	-41.16% Dec 9, 1999 - Dec 5, 2000	-67.05% May 22, 2015 - Aug 15, 2019
#4	-32.55% Dec 11, 2024 - Jul 16, 2026	-63.15% Jul 10, 2025 - Jun 5, 2026
#5	-32.01% Nov 8, 2021 - Jan 25, 2023	-45.34% Dec 6, 2024 - Jun 30, 2025
#6	-24.47% May 10, 2016 - Nov 9, 2016	-16.67% May 5, 2015 - May 20, 2015
#7	-20.41% Aug 11, 2023 - Dec 14, 2023	-14.92% Jan 30, 2015 - Mar 4, 2015
#8	-19.47% Jan 17, 2001 - May 9, 2001	-13.38% Jan 27, 2021 - Feb 9, 2021
#9	-18.76% Jul 26, 2024 - Dec 4, 2024	-12.52% Nov 6, 2024 - Nov 29, 2024
#10	-16.11% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 23, 1999	-5.83% Jan 14, 2021 - Jan 27, 2021
#11	-16.04% Sep 10, 2001 - Oct 9, 2001	-5.74% Mar 4, 2015 - Mar 11, 2015
#12	-15.91% Nov 26, 2001 - Jan 24, 2002	-5.73% Apr 20, 2015 - Apr 24, 2015
#13	-15.43% Mar 3, 2023 - Jun 7, 2023	-5.46% Mar 13, 2015 - Mar 23, 2015
#14	-14.54% May 6, 2021 - Sep 27, 2021	-4.34% Mar 24, 2015 - Mar 30, 2015
#15	-13.43% Mar 5, 2024 - Jul 11, 2024	-4.10% Apr 14, 2015 - Apr 16, 2015