AEHR vs CXW

Comparison between Aehr Test Systems (AEHR, Company) and CoreCivic Inc (CXW, Company).

AEHR is from the Technology sector, while CXW is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceAEHR has outperformed CXW, delivering a return of +104.4% compared to +20.7%

AEHR vs CXW - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	AEHR(COMPANY)	CXW(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$2.95B	$2.95B
Max Drawdown	95.45%	97.37%
Sharpe Ratio	2.34	1.08
5Y Beta	2.94	0.79
Industry	Semiconductor Equipment & Materials	Security & Protection Services
P/E Ratio	-317.02	23.70
Forward P/E	9.86	18.59
PEG Ratio	N/A	0.37
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	-7.36%
5Y EPS CAGR	-10.20%	N/A
Debt to Equity	0.00%	100.14%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-0.41%	5.56%

Market Cap

AEHR

$2.95B

Winner

CXW

$2.95B

Max Drawdown

Winner

AEHR

95.45%

CXW

97.37%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

AEHR

2.34

CXW

1.08

5Y Beta

AEHR

2.94

Winner

CXW

0.79

Industry

AEHR

Semiconductor Equipment & Materials

CXW

Security & Protection Services

P/E Ratio

Winner

AEHR

-317.02

CXW

23.70

Forward P/E

Winner

AEHR

9.86

CXW

18.59

PEG Ratio

AEHR

N/A

CXW

0.37

5Y Dividends CAGR

AEHR

N/A

CXW

-7.36%

5Y EPS CAGR

AEHR

-10.20%

CXW

N/A

Debt to Equity

Winner

AEHR

0.00%

CXW

100.14%

Free Cash Flow Yield

AEHR

-0.41%

Winner

CXW

5.56%

AEHR vs CXW - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	AEHR	CXW
1 month	+0.19%	+38.60%
3 months	+142.92%	+49.45%
6 months	+331.35%	+56.02%
1 year	+695.32%	+46.29%
5 years(CAGR)	+104.39%	+20.67%
10 years(CAGR)	+49.39%	+2.07%
Max(CAGR)	+12.08%	+4.56%

AEHR

+0.19%

Winner

CXW

+38.60%

Winner

AEHR

+142.92%

CXW

+49.45%

Winner

AEHR

+331.35%

CXW

+56.02%

Winner

AEHR

+695.32%

CXW

+46.29%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

AEHR

+104.39%

CXW

+20.67%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

AEHR

+49.39%

CXW

+2.07%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

AEHR

+12.08%

CXW

+4.56%

AEHR vs CXW - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	AEHR	CXW
2026	+329.60%	+56.68%
2025	+21.99%	-12.06%
2024	-33.35%	+50.45%
2023	+44.26%	+26.57%
2022	-14.07%	+14.12%
2021	+899.17%	+48.81%
2020	+22.22%	-59.50%
2019	+29.87%	+7.09%
2018	-49.64%	-14.26%
2017	+13.87%	-3.81%
2016	+28.19%	-1.74%
2015	-31.64%	-22.91%
2014	-19.05%	+19.62%
2013	+267.86%	+10.92%
2012	+44.07%	+72.04%
2011	-55.93%	-18.75%
2010	-14.29%	+0.32%
2009	-45.00%	+46.39%
2008	-66.34%	-43.51%
2007	+17.31%	+29.37%
2006	+20.77%	+47.91%
2005	+3.48%	+11.01%
2004	+32.72%	+37.68%
2003	+13.14%	+68.40%
2002	-35.79%	-4.72%
2001	-15.00%	+388.41%
2000	+5.00%	-87.84%
1999	+9.58%	-52.40%

AEHR vs CXW Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for AEHR was -95.45%, occurring on Nov 22, 2011. Recovery took 3824 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CXW was -95.29%, occurring on Dec 15, 2000. Recovery took 1698 trading sessions.

The current AEHR drawdown is -18.34%.

Rank	AEHR	CXW
#1	-95.45% Jul 5, 2006 - Sep 13, 2021	-95.29% Nov 1, 1999 - Aug 3, 2006
#2	-87.37% Aug 1, 2023 - Apr 8, 2026	-78.32% Mar 20, 2015 - Jun 15, 2026
#3	-81.47% Mar 15, 2000 - Jun 29, 2006	-70.25% Jul 5, 2007 - Aug 15, 2012
#4	-73.02% Nov 5, 2021 - Nov 23, 2022	-18.78% May 17, 2013 - Oct 28, 2014
#5	-39.77% Mar 23, 2023 - Jun 2, 2023	-9.07% Nov 7, 2006 - Jan 19, 2007
#6	-36.27% Dec 1, 2022 - Jan 10, 2023	-8.96% Nov 6, 2012 - Dec 7, 2012
#7	-23.70% May 14, 2026 - May 26, 2026	-7.17% Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 13, 2007
#8	-22.22% Feb 14, 2000 - Mar 13, 2000	-6.43% Feb 7, 2013 - Mar 28, 2013
#9	-20.35% Sep 24, 2021 - Oct 7, 2021	-6.04% Sep 13, 2012 - Nov 1, 2012
#10	-20.29% Feb 2, 2023 - Mar 21, 2023	-5.88% Feb 18, 2015 - Mar 19, 2015
#11	-19.95% Jun 4, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026	-5.57% Sep 12, 2006 - Oct 5, 2006
#12	-16.00% May 26, 2026 - Jun 2, 2026	-4.89% Nov 4, 2014 - Dec 18, 2014
#13	-15.97% Apr 22, 2026 - May 11, 2026	-4.40% Oct 5, 2006 - Nov 6, 2006
#14	-13.68% Jul 3, 2023 - Jul 14, 2023	-4.39% Jun 19, 2007 - Jul 5, 2007
#15	-11.96% Jun 14, 2023 - Jul 3, 2023	-3.97% Jan 29, 2015 - Feb 13, 2015