StockComparison Logo
vs

ABM vs CXW

Comparison between ABM Industries Inc (ABM, Company) and CoreCivic Inc (CXW, Company).

Both ABM and CXW are from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceCXW has outperformed ABM, delivering a return of +18.9% compared to +1.0%

ABM vs CXW - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
ABM
$2.63B
CXW
$2.62B
Max Drawdown
Winner
ABM
61.26%
CXW
97.37%
Sharpe Ratio
ABM
-0.03
Winner
CXW
0.64
5Y Beta
Winner
ABM
0.68
CXW
0.79
Industry
ABM
Specialty Business Services
CXW
Security & Protection Services
P/E Ratio
Winner
ABM
16.91
CXW
21.03
Forward P/E
Winner
ABM
9.13
CXW
15.75
PEG Ratio
Winner
ABM
0.15
CXW
0.33
Dividend Yield
ABM
2.47%
CXW
N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
ABM
12.89%
CXW
-7.36%
5Y EPS CAGR
ABM
-3.74%
CXW
N/A
Debt to Equity
ABM
106.58%
Winner
CXW
100.14%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
ABM
12.71%
CXW
6.27%
P/S Ratio
Winner
ABM
0.29
CXW
1.06
P/B Ratio
Winner
ABM
1.48
CXW
1.78

ABM vs CXW - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
ABM
+17.07%
Winner
CXW
+38.21%
3M
ABM
+19.72%
Winner
CXW
+53.57%
6M
ABM
-0.09%
Winner
CXW
+43.33%
1Y
ABM
+1.74%
Winner
CXW
+26.12%
5Y(CAGR)
ABM
+0.98%
Winner
CXW
+18.87%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
ABM
+4.34%
CXW
+1.18%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
ABM
+7.60%
CXW
+4.19%

ABM vs CXW - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearABMCXW
2026+9.18%+42.43%
2025-15.84%-12.06%
2024+17.10%+50.45%
2023+1.92%+26.57%
2022+10.64%+14.12%
2021+12.51%+48.81%
2020+0.28%-59.50%
2019+22.93%+7.09%
2018-13.12%-14.26%
2017-6.43%-3.81%
2016+50.55%-1.74%
2015+1.75%-22.91%
2014+3.77%+19.62%
2013+43.61%+10.92%
2012-1.70%+72.04%
2011-21.21%-18.75%
2010+26.88%+0.32%
2009+12.63%+46.39%
2008-3.32%-43.51%
2007-10.09%+29.37%
2006+18.20%+47.91%
2005+5.62%+11.01%
2004+13.79%+37.68%
2003+12.17%+68.40%
2002+3.14%-4.72%
2001+6.08%+388.41%
2000+54.84%-87.84%
1999-13.97%-52.40%

ABM vs CXW Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for ABM was -59.62%, occurring on Mar 2, 2009. Recovery took 1541 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CXW was -95.29%, occurring on Dec 15, 2000. Recovery took 1698 trading sessions.

The current ABM drawdown is -18.72%. The current CXW drawdown is -0.80%.

RankABMCXW
#1-59.62%
Jun 5, 2007 - Jul 18, 2013
-95.29%
Nov 1, 1999 - Aug 3, 2006
#2-51.98%
Jul 27, 2017 - Jan 13, 2021
-78.32%
Mar 20, 2015 - Oct 28, 2020
#3-34.35%
Nov 11, 2024 - Mar 20, 2026
-70.25%
Jul 5, 2007 - Aug 15, 2012
#4-34.25%
Jun 21, 2001 - Mar 26, 2002
-18.78%
May 17, 2013 - Oct 28, 2014
#5-33.33%
May 3, 2002 - Jan 15, 2004
-9.07%
Nov 7, 2006 - Jan 19, 2007
#6-28.98%
Apr 22, 2022 - Dec 13, 2023
-8.96%
Nov 6, 2012 - Dec 7, 2012
#7-26.63%
Apr 23, 2021 - Apr 20, 2022
-7.17%
Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 13, 2007
#8-24.59%
Dec 1, 2004 - Dec 13, 2006
-6.43%
Feb 7, 2013 - Mar 28, 2013
#9-23.45%
Dec 13, 2023 - Jun 21, 2024
-6.04%
Sep 13, 2012 - Nov 1, 2012
#10-20.43%
Aug 17, 2015 - May 10, 2016
-5.88%
Feb 18, 2015 - Mar 19, 2015
#11-19.53%
Mar 23, 2000 - Aug 30, 2000
-5.57%
Sep 12, 2006 - Oct 5, 2006
#12-17.56%
Nov 1, 1999 - Feb 16, 2000
-4.89%
Nov 4, 2014 - Dec 18, 2014
#13-15.59%
Mar 4, 2014 - Dec 23, 2014
-4.40%
Oct 5, 2006 - Nov 6, 2006
#14-14.17%
Aug 30, 2024 - Nov 6, 2024
-4.39%
Jun 19, 2007 - Jul 5, 2007
#15-12.99%
Jun 8, 2004 - Sep 10, 2004
-3.97%
Jan 29, 2015 - Feb 13, 2015

Correlation

Correlation between ABM and CXW is 0.54 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.54
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

ABM vs CXW dividend yield comparison.

YearABMCXW
20261.26%0.00%
20252.51%0.00%
20241.76%0.00%
20231.96%0.00%
20221.76%0.00%
20211.86%0.00%
20201.47%13.44%
20192.40%7.59%
20182.18%9.65%
20171.80%7.47%
20161.62%8.34%
20151.69%8.15%
20142.18%5.61%
20132.12%26.82%
20123.66%1.69%
20112.72%0.00%
20102.05%0.00%
20092.52%0.00%
20082.62%0.00%
20072.35%0.00%
20061.94%0.00%
20052.15%0.00%
20042.03%0.00%
20032.18%0.00%
20022.32%0.00%
20012.11%0.00%
20002.02%275.74%

Select Stocks to Compare